Fabrication of Hollow Fiber Supported TiO2 Ultrafiltration Membranes via Ultrasound-assisted Sol-Gel Method

doi:10.15541/jim20220185

Abstract

Abstract:

TiO₂ membranes have been applied in ultrafiltration (UF) separation due to their strong hydrophilicity and good thermochemical stability, but most of them are tubular membranes with low permeation flux and time-consuming preparation. To improve the flux and save the preparation time of TiO₂ membrane, hollow fiber supported TiO₂ UF membranes were prepared via ultrasound-assisted Sol-Gel method by using tetrabutyl titanate as precursor. Effects of acid/titanium molar ratio, ultrasound time and calcination temperature on TiO₂ sols and UF performance of membranes were investigated extensively. The results showed that when the acid/titanium ratio was 0.25, the obtained TiO₂ sol showed an average particle size of 3252 nm, which would be reduced to 1817 nm after ultrasonic treatment for 30 s. Coating with the above TiO₂ sol, defect-free TiO₂ UF membrane with average thickness of 1 μm can be prepared on hollow fiber support by calcining at 350 ℃ twice. The pure water flux of the obtained membrane was 145 L·m^-2·h^-1·bar^-1, and the dextran molecular weight at 90% rejection of membrane was 2586 Da with corresponding average pore size of 2.5 nm.

Key words: ultrafiltration membrane, sol, gel, TiO₂, ultrasound-assistance

CLC Number:

TQ174

LÜ Qingyang, ZHANG Yuting, GU Xuehong. Fabrication of Hollow Fiber Supported TiO₂ Ultrafiltration Membranes via Ultrasound-assisted Sol-Gel Method[J]. Journal of Inorganic Materials, 2022, 37(10): 1051-1057.

Figures/Tables 11

Fig. 1 Particle size distribution of TiO2 sols prepared with different acid/titanium ratios (x)

Fig. 2 Surface and cross-section SEM images of TiO2 membranes prepared with different acid/titanium ratios (a1, a2) CM0.25-0-350; (b1, b2) CM0.5-0-350; (c1, c2) CM0.75-0-350

Fig. 3 Particle size distribution of TiO2 sols (S0.25) after ultrasound treatment for different periods

Fig. 4 Surface and cross-section SEM images of TiO2 membranes prepared by sonication for different periods (a1, a2) UM0.25-15-350; (b1, b2) UM0.25-30-350; (c1, c2) UM0.25-45-350

Fig. 5 Schematic diagram of proposed formation mechanism of TiO2 membranes prepared by conventional and ultrasound-assisted Sol-Gel methods

Fig. 6 XRD patterns of TiO2 powders calcined at different temperatures

Fig. 7 Surface SEM and 3D morphologies of TiO2 membranes calcined at different temperatures (a) UM0.25-30-350; (b) UM0.25-30-400; (c) UM0.25-30-450; (d) UM0.25-30-500

Fig. 8 Dextran rejection of TiO2 membranes prepared with different acid/titanium ratios

Fig. 9 Dextran rejection of TiO2 membranes prepared by sonication for different periods

Fig. 10 Dextran rejection of TiO2 membranes calcined at different temperatures

Table 1 Comparison between TiO2 membranes prepared by conventional and ultrasound-assisted sol-gel method

Membrane	Membrane configuration	Calcination temperature/℃	Pore size / nm	Thickness/ μm	Coating number	Water flux/ (L·m^-2·h^-1·bar^-1)	MWCO/ Da	Ref.
P₂₅-TiO₂	Tube	400	3.6	2	4	128	5600	[12]
MXene-TiO₂	Tube	400	6.5	5	1	90	22000	[15]
P123-TiO₂	Tube	400	6.1	2	3	7.16	19000	[19]
CM_0.5-0-350	Hollow fiber	350	4.4	5	3	142	9078	This work
UM_0.25-30-350	Hollow fiber	350	2.5	1	2	145	2586	This work

References 30

[1]	ZHU B, HU Y X, KENNEDY S, et al. Dual function filtration and catalytic breakdown of organic pollutants in wastewater using ozonation with titania and alumina membranes. Journal of Membrane Science, 2011, 378(1/2): 61-72. DOI URL
[2]	ALVENTOSA E, BARREDO S, ALCAINA M L, et al. Ultrafiltration technology with a ceramic membrane for reactive dye removal: optimization of membrane performance. Journal of Hazard Mater., 2012(209/210): 492-500.
[3]	KOVACS I, VEREB G, KERTESZ S, et al. Fouling mitigation and cleanability of TiO₂ photocatalyst-modified PVDF membranes during ultrafiltration of model oily wastewater with different salt contents. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2018, 25(35): 34912-34921. DOI URL
[4]	GASCHI P S, GASCHI P S, BARROS S T, et al. Pretreatment with ceramic membrane microfiltration in the clarification process of sugarcane juice by ultrafiltration. Acta Scientiarum Technology, 2014, 36(2): 303-306. DOI URL
[5]	LEHMAN S G, LIU L. Application of ceramic membranes with pre-ozonation for treatment of secondary wastewater effluent. Water Reseach, 2009, 43(7): 2020-2028.
[6]	KUZNIATSOVA T, MOTTERN M L, SHQAU K, et al. Micro-structural optimization of supported γ-alumina membranes. Journal of Membrane Science, 2008, 316(1/2): 80-88. DOI URL
[7]	GESTEL T V, KRUIDHOF H, BLANK D H A, et al. ZrO₂ and TiO₂ membranes for nanofiltration and pervaporation Part 1. Preparation and characterization of a corrosion-resistant ZrO₂ nanofiltration membrane with a MWCO<300. Journal of Membrane Science, 2006, 284(1/2): 128-136. DOI URL
[8]	YACOU C, SMART S, COSTA J C D D. Mesoporous TiO₂ based membranes for water desalination and brine processing. Separation and Purification Technology, 2015, 147: 166-171. DOI URL
[9]	CHOI H, STATHATOS E, DIONYSIOU D D. Sol-Gel preparation of mesoporous photocatalytic TiO₂ films and TiO₂-Al₂O₃ composite membranes for environmental applications. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, 2006, 63: 60-67. DOI URL
[10]	DOBRAK A, VERRECHT B, DUNGEN H V D, et al. Solvent flux behavior and rejection characteristics of hydrophilic and hydrophobic mesoporous and microporous TiO₂ and ZrO₂ membranes. Journal of Membrane Science, 2010, 346(2): 344-352. DOI URL
[11]	GESTEL T V, SEBOLD D, HAULER F, et al. Potentialities of microporous membranes for H₂/CO₂ separation in future fossil fuel power plants: evaluation of SiO₂, ZrO₂, Y₂O₃-ZrO₂and TiO₂-ZrO₂Sol-Gel membranes. Journal of Membrane Science, 2010, 359(1/2): 64-79. DOI URL
[12]	LI D, WANG H, JING W H, et al. Fabrication of mesoporous TiO₂ membranes by a nanoparticle-modified polymeric sol process. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 2014, 433: 43-48. DOI URL
[13]	KIM Y S, YANG S M. Preparation of continuous mesoporous silica thin film on a porous tube. Advanced Materials, 2002, 14(15): 1079-1081.
[14]	TSURU T, NARITA M, SHINAGAWA R, et al. Nanoporous titania membranes for permeation and filtration of organic solutions. Desalination, 2008, 233(1/2/3): 1-9. DOI URL
[15]	XU Z, SUN Y Q, ZHUANG Y X, et al. Assembly of 2D MXene nanosheets and TiO₂ nanoparticles for fabricating mesoporous TiO₂-MXene membranes. Journal of Membrane Science, 2018, 564: 35-43. DOI URL
[16]	CABRERA M C C, WALKER G S, GRANT D M. Effect of processing parameters on the particle size and stabilisation of titania sols. Journal of Materials Science, 2005, 40: 3709-3714. DOI URL
[17]	CAI Y Y, WANG Y, CHEN X F, et al. Modified colloidal Sol-Gel process for fabrication of titania nanofiltration membranes with organic additives. Journal of Membrane Science, 2015, 476: 432-441. DOI URL
[18]	GESTEL T V, VANDECASTEELE C, BUEKENHOUDT A, et al. Corrosion properties of alumina and titania NF membranes. Journal of Membrane Science, 2003, 214(1): 21-29. DOI URL
[19]	JING W H, HUANG W, XING W H, et al. Fabrication of supported mesoporous TiO₂ membranes:matching the assembled and interparticle pores for an improved ultrafiltration performance. Applied Materials and Interfaces, 2009, 1(7): 1607-1612. DOI URL
[20]	QIU M H, FAN S, CAI Y Y, et al. Co-sintering synthesis of bi-layer titania ultrafiltration membranes with intermediate layer of sol-coated nanofibers. Journal of Membrane Science, 2010, 365(1/2): 225-231. DOI URL
[21]	WU L Q, HUANG P, XU N P, et al. Effects of sol properties and calcination on the performance of titania tubular membranes. Journal of Membrane Science, 2000, 173: 263-273. DOI URL
[22]	WANG P, CHUNG T S. A new-generation asymmetric multi-bore hollow fiber membrane for sustainable water production via vacuum membrane distillation. Environmental Science and Technology, 2013, 47(12): 6272-6278. DOI URL
[23]	SHI Z Z, ZHANG Y T, CAI C, et al. Preparation and characterization of α-Al₂O₃ hollow fiber membranes with four- channel configuration. Ceramics International, 2015, 41(1): 1333-1339. DOI URL
[24]	CAI C, ZHANG Y T, ZHANG C, et al. Microstructure modulation of α-Al₂O₃hollow fiber membranes with four-channel geometric configuration. Asia-Pacific Journal of Chemical Engineering, 2016, 11(6): 949-957. DOI URL
[25]	DING X B, FAN Y Q, XU N P. A new route for the fabrication of TiO₂ ultrafiltration membranes with suspension derived from a wet chemical synthesis. Journal of Membrane Science, 2006, 270(1/2): 179-186. DOI URL
[26]	WHU J A, BALTZIS B C, SIRKAR K K. Nanofiltration studies of larger organic microsolutes in methanol solutions. Journal of Membrane Science, 2000, 170: 159-172. DOI URL
[27]	ALVES A K, BERUTTI F A, BERGMANN C P. The effects of pH on the preparation of alumina by Sol-Gel process. Particulate Science and Technology, 2005, 23(4): 351-360. DOI URL
[28]	TSURU T, OGAWA K, KANEZASHI M, et al. Permeation characteristics of electrolytes and neutral solutes through titania nanofiltration membranes at high temperatures. Langmuir, 2010, 26(13): 10897-10905. DOI PMID
[29]	SKLUZACEK J M, ISABEL T M, MARC A A. Influence of membrane support structure on the efficiency of an iron-modified silica nanofiltration membrane. Journal of Porous Materials, 2007, 15(3): 303-309. DOI URL
[30]	ZASPALIS V T, PRAAG W V, KEIZER K, et al. Synthesis and characterization of primary alumina, titania and binary membranes. Journal of Materials Science, 1992, 27: 1023-1035. DOI URL

Fabrication of Hollow Fiber Supported TiO₂ Ultrafiltration Membranes via Ultrasound-assisted Sol-Gel Method

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 11

References 30

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments

[1]	KONG Guoqiang, LENG Mingzhe, ZHOU Zhanrong, XIA Chi, SHEN Xiaofang. Sb Doped O3 Type Na_0.9Ni_0.5Mn_0.3Ti_0.2O₂ Cathode Material for Na-ion Battery [J]. Journal of Inorganic Materials, 2023, 38(6): 656-662.
[2]	GUO Tianmin, DONG Jiangbo, CHEN Zhengpeng, RAO Mumin, LI Mingfei, LI Tian, LING Yihan. Enhanced Compatibility and Activity of High-entropy Double Perovskite Cathode Material for IT-SOFC [J]. Journal of Inorganic Materials, 2023, 38(6): 693-700.
[3]	ZHANG Xiangsong, LIU Yetong, WANG Yongying, WU Zirui, LIU Zhenzhong, LI Yi, YANG Juan. Self-assembled Platinum-iridium Alloy Aerogels and Their Efficient Electrocatalytic Ammonia Oxidation Performance [J]. Journal of Inorganic Materials, 2023, 38(5): 511-520.
[4]	CHEN Xinli, LI Yan, WANG Weisheng, SHI Zhiwen, ZHU Liqiang. Gelatin/Carboxylated Chitosan Gated Oxide Neuromorphic Transistor [J]. Journal of Inorganic Materials, 2023, 38(4): 421-428.
[5]	SUN Han, LI Wenjun, JIA Zixuan, ZHANG Yan, YIN Liying, JIE Wanqi, XU Yadong. Effect of ACRT Technology on the Large Size ZnTe Crystals Grown by Solution Method and Corresponding Terahertz Properties [J]. Journal of Inorganic Materials, 2023, 38(3): 310-315.
[6]	MU Honghe, WANG Pengfei, SHI Yufeng, ZHANG Zhonghan, WU Anhua, SU Liangbi. Large-size CeF₃Crystal Growth by Heat Exchanger-Bridgman Method: Thermal Field Design and Optimization [J]. Journal of Inorganic Materials, 2023, 38(3): 288-295.
[7]	JIN Xihai, DONG Manjiang, KAN Yanmei, LIANG Bo, DONG Shaoming. Fabrication of Transparent AlON by Gel Casting and Pressureless Sintering [J]. Journal of Inorganic Materials, 2023, 38(2): 193-198.
[8]	ZHANG Wanwen, LUO Jianqiang, LIU Shujuan, MA Jianguo, ZHANG Xiaoping, YANG Songwang. Zirconia Spacer: Preparation by Low Temperature Spray-coating and Application in Triple-layer Perovskite Solar Cells [J]. Journal of Inorganic Materials, 2023, 38(2): 213-218.
[9]	FENG Jingjing, ZHANG Youran, MA Mingsheng, LU Yiqing, LIU Zhifu. Current Status and Development Trend of Cold Sintering Process [J]. Journal of Inorganic Materials, 2023, 38(2): 125-136.
[10]	LI Wenjun, WANG Hao, TU Bingtian, CHEN Qiangguo, ZHENG Kaiping, WANG Weiming, FU Zhengyi. Preparation and Property of Mg_0.9Al_2.08O_3.97N_0.03 Transparent Ceramic with Broad Optical Transmission Range [J]. Journal of Inorganic Materials, 2022, 37(9): 969-975.
[11]	WANG Shiwei. Progress of Spontaneous Coagulation Casting of Ceramic Slurries Based on Hydrophobic Interaction [J]. Journal of Inorganic Materials, 2022, 37(8): 809-820.
[12]	WANG Xiaojun, XU Wen, LIU Runlu, PAN Hui, ZHU Shenmin. Preparation and Properties of Ag@C₃N₄ Photocatalyst Supported by Hydrogel [J]. Journal of Inorganic Materials, 2022, 37(7): 731-740.
[13]	JIANG Yiyi, SHEN Min, SONG Banxia, LI Nan, DING Xianghuan, GUO Leyi, MA Guoqiang. Effect of Dual-functional Electrolyte Additive on High Temperature and High Voltage Performance of Li-ion Battery [J]. Journal of Inorganic Materials, 2022, 37(7): 710-716.
[14]	SU Dongliang, CUI Jin, ZHAI Pengbo, GUO Xiangxin. Mechanism Study on Garnet-type Li_6.4La₃Zr_1.4Ta_0.6O₁₂ Regulating the Solid Electrolyte Interphases of Si/C Anodes [J]. Journal of Inorganic Materials, 2022, 37(7): 802-808.
[15]	JIAO Boxin, LIU Xingchong, QUAN Ziwei, PENG Yongshan, ZHOU Ruonan, LI Haimin. Performance of Perovskite solar cells Doped with L-arginine [J]. Journal of Inorganic Materials, 2022, 37(6): 669-675.