Journal of Inorganic Materials ›› 2016, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (2): 213-219.DOI: 10.15541/jim20150410

• Orginal Article • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Investigation on Two Methods for Evaluating Mechanical Properties of Tube Materials

LIU Zhao1, BAO Yi-Wang1, WAN De-Tian1, HU Chun-Lin2, MA De-Long1, TIAN Yuan1   

  1. (1. State Key Laboratory of Green Building Materials, China Building Materials Academy, Beijing 100024, China; 2. Department of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan 430070, China)
  • Received:2015-08-31 Revised:2015-09-25 Published:2016-02-20 Online:2016-01-15
  • About author:LIU Zhao (1989–), male, candidate of Master degree. E-mail: liuzhao7945@163.com
  • Supported by:
    National Natural Science Foundation of China (51172221, 51472227);Major Program of Scientific Instrument and Equipment Development of China (2011YQ140145);National High Technology Research and Development Program of China (863 Program, 2015AA034204)

Abstract:

Elastic modulus and bending strength of tube materials were evaluated via compressing a split ring sample or a closed ring sample for different materials. Elastic modulus was estimated from the load-displacement relationship and sample dimensions in the range of elasticity, while bending strength was derived through the critical load at fracture. In this work, four tube materials were divided in two groups to research the applicable scopes of two methods. The results indicate that the split ring is suitable for materials with high brittleness and low limit strain, while the closed ring is available for low-stiffness materials. Comparison with the three-point bending data demonstrated the validity and convenience of two methods with the respective applicable range.

Key words: elastic modulus, bending strength, split ring, closed ring, tube materials

CLC Number: