[1] Boyan B D, Sylvia V L, Liu Y, et al. Surface roughness mediates its effects on osteoblasts via protein kinase A and phospholipase A2. Biomaterials, 1999, 20(23/24):2305-2310.[2] Mustafa K, Wroblewski J, Lopez B S, et al. Determining optimal surface roughness of TiO2 blasted titanium implant material for attachment, proliferation and differentiation of cells derived from human mandibular alveolar bone. Clinical Oral Implants Research, 2008, 12(5):515-525.[3] Lincks J, Boyan B, Blanchard C, et al. Response of MG-63 osteoblast-like cells to titanium and titanium alloy is dependent on surface roughness and composition. Biomaterials, 1998, 19(23):2219-2232.[4] Yang F, Dong W, He F, et al. Osteoblast response to porous titanium surfaces coated with zinc-substituted hydroxyapatite. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology and Oral Radiology, 2012, 113(3):313-318.[5] Zhe W, Zhan-Wen X, Hong-Song F, et al. Fabrication of micro-grooved patterns on hydroxyapatite ceramics and observation of earlier response of osteoblasts to the patterns. Journal of Inorganic Materials, 2013, 28(1):51-57.[6] Boyan B, Bonewald L, Paschalis E, et al. Osteoblast-mediated mineral deposition in culture is dependent on surface microtopography. Calcified Tissue International, 2002, 71(6): 519-529.[7] Lohmann C, Bonewald L, Sisk M, et al. Maturation state determines the response of osteogenic cells to surface roughness and 1, 25-dihydroxyvitamin D3. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research, 2000, 15(6):1169-1180.[8] Yuan H, Kurashina K, de Bruijn J D, et al. A preliminary study on osteoinduction of two kinds of calcium phosphate ceramics. Biomaterials, 1999, 20(19):1799-1806.[9] Wu C, Chang J, Zhai W, et al. Porous akermanite scaffolds for bone tissue engineering: preparation, characterization, and in vitro studies. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part B: Applied Biomaterials, 2006, 78(1):47-55.[10] Deligianni D D, Katsala N D, Koutsoukos P G, et al. Effect of surface roughness of hydroxyapatite on human bone marrow cell adhesion, proliferation, differentiation and detachment strength. Biomaterials, 2000, 22(1):87-96.[11] Rosa AL, Beloti MM, van Noort R. Osteoblastic differentiation of cultured rat bone marrow cells on hydroxyapatite with different surface topography. Dental Materials, 2003, 19(8):768-772.[12] Gonzalez-McQuire R, Green D, Walsh D, et al. Fabrication of hydroxyapatite sponges by dextran sulphate/amino acid templating. Biomaterials, 2005, 26(33):6652-6656.[13] Chen X N, Zhu X D, Fan H S, et al. Rat bone marrow cell responses on the surface of hydroxyapatite with different topography. Key Engineering Materials, 2008, 361-363:1107-1110.[14] Hui-Tao L, Wei Z, Xiong L, et al. Research on preparation and biological properties of dense hydroxyapatite spheres. Journal of Inorganic Materials, 2013, 28(1):40-44.[15] Billiau A, Edy V, Heremans H, et al. Human interferon: mass production in a newly established cell line, MG-63. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, 1977, 12(1):11-15.[16] Lian J B, Stein G S. Concepts of osteoblast growth and differentiation: basis for modulation of bone cell development and tissue formation. Critical Reviews in Oral Biology & Medicine, 1992, 3(3):269-305.[17] Schneider G, Perinpanayagam H, Clegg M, et al. Implant surface. roughness affects osteoblast gene expression. Journal of Dental Research, 2003, 82(5):372-376. |